A Superior Financial Services Regulatory Model

What percent of lawyers facilitate or ignore white-collar crime?

We can dramatically reduced or almost eliminate that percentage. This site introduces the idea of adapting a Fin-Reg model used for the futures industry to include all lawyers, accountants and CEO’s of any industry. The model has proven to be successful over the past 30 years. It pays for itself, therefore eliminates current and future financial burdens incurred by superfluous and redundant government regulation. If site content stimulates an inner prompting to do something constructive, please pass it along to anyone that can use the ideas offered.

Court Refuses to Give Me My Inheritance UNLESS! A Explanation From My Attorney

Reform the Regulators

First, look at pages from brochures offered by the Disciplinary Committeeand Commission on Judicial ConductThe DC tells people to use the DA. The DA does nothing but refer people back to the grievance committee and the court. The commission on judicial conduct does less than nothing. It takes action on complaints that the system is "set-up to easily bury or hide".

Regulators I contacted since September 2001 and their responses are listed below and on the next two pages. While my Mother was alive, there was no place in NYC to report stealing under a forged POA. The greatest strength of each regulatory agency is to do nothing. A simple example is noted above. Two more examples are that the ProSe office at the Supreme Court told me that this belongs at the DA. The DA refused to open the case. The Department of Justice US Attorney's Office said this belongs at the FBI, and the FBI said they cannot find any federal laws that were broken. ( If I could find broken federal laws, they would re-examine the decision to do nothing!)

Below the list of regulators doing nothing are suggestions for constructive change and the benefits.

August 21, 2005, I recently received a letter from the Attorney General's office. I wrote to Albany. Link to the response here.

December 6, 2004. Yesterday a letter from the Department of Justice arrived! Based on documentation they read, they suggested that the FBI be contacted. It was done! Link here to the DOJ letter . Happy Holidays to All!

October 28, 2004 I was told that the DA will call me when they process information necessary to have intelligent conversation. Today is October 8, 2007, I am still waiting. The DA never called.

The Mayor's Advisory on the Judiciary web site instructs people to file a copy of complaints to them and the chief administrative judge. Link to the site text here. I did that and received a letter from the Deputy Chief Administrative Judge. She referred my complaint to the judge I was complaining about and suggested that all further communication be directed to that judge.

Link to the letter here TRUE STORY! On a more constructive note, I received a thank you from the US Attorney Office in DC. Naturally it was from the Federal Government, not the state! That tells us someone productive read this site! Link to the thank you here!

October 23, 2004 - I receive a response from the New York State Commission of Investigation. They have no need to investigate and suggest I hire a lawyer. I responded kindly - I really did! Link to their letter and my response.

August 4, 7 and 25th 2004 my petition to remove the executor, her response, references to the executor's misleading content and a cover letter went to the US Attorney Office in NYC and the STATE Judicial Review Committee. What they received is included in the petition. Link to US Attorney response here Link to The Judicial Review Committee response here.

Link to the Judges Decision or Court order and Transcript of the 8-25-04 Session

September 11, 2004 I receive a letter dated 9-9-04 from the Judicial Review Committee saying they never received my original complaint. Would I please send another one. The original was sent certified mail return receipt requested. It was signed for on August 10, 2004. The JRC is in the same building at the Grievance Committee, for whatever that's worth. I sent another copy today - September 13, 2004 Link here to read the letters . The Judicial Review Committee dismissed my complaint on April 1, 2005. Again Link here to the letter.

1. This was first reported to the DA in September 2001. I was told by the special prosecutions intake line to get the story in front of a Judge. If the Judge saw anything wrong it would be reported to the DA. The DA also claims to specialize in
illegal use of law. The court did nothing.
http://www.manhattanda.org/office_overview/investigation/legal/special_pros.htm

Remember that the Court has no power for independent investigation. People need legal skills to get anything in front of a Judge and probably most important to remember is that the court believes and rules on everything submitted.

2. Via God’s grace this incident was officially reported to the Surrogate Court on October 15 2001, in a document called A Response to a Constructive Trust –
Link here to the document a letter to the DA dated 9-2001 is included.

A ruling on my petition was issued by the Court telling the executor to escrow money for me until the estate was settled. (A ruling is included in the petition to remove the executor.) There was an illegal mortgage taken under a forged POA on property left exclusively to me. That court order was ignored and never executed.

3. This was officially reported to the Grievance Committee in Dec 2001. A letter from the committee told me to bring actions of the executors lawyers to the attention of the court. If the court saw anything wrong, the disciplinary committee would take action. Again everybody did nothing -

In Feb 2002 and shortly after, several mediation meetings were held. Everyone agreed to stop stealing at the meeting. When they left, everyone kept on stealing. The Court was made aware that all agreements were broken. Link here to a letter dated March 2002.That letter was also included in a petition for living expenses. Because the grievance committee told me bring the actions of the executor's lawyers to the court's attention, I referenced all fraud submitted in each court petition. Letters to the court are available if anyone wants them. Still the court reported nothing to the DA. I also prepared a document for the Court so an independent investigation would be easier. I didn’t know, they do nothing and the document would not be part of the records. Link here to the document.


What percent of lawyers facilitate or ignore white-collar crime? We can dramatically reduced or almost eliminate that percentage. This site introduces the idea of adapting a Fin-Reg model used for the futures industry to include all lawyers, accountants and CEO’s of any industry. The model has proven to be successful over the past 30 years. It pays for itself, therefore eliminates current and future financial burdens incurred by superfluous and redundant government regulation. If site content stimulates an inner prompting to do something constructive, please pass it along to anyone that can use the ideas offered.
Index Dedication Gratitude About Us Contact Us Documents I Submitted Superior Regulation Judicial Decisions Reform Regulators Events-Solutions Restore People For Our Children Links	Court Refuses to Give Me My Inheritance UNLESS! A Explanation From My Attorney Reform the Regulators First, look at pages from brochures offered by the Disciplinary Committeeand Commission on Judicial ConductThe DC tells people to use the DA. The DA does nothing but refer people back to the grievance committee and the court. The commission on judicial conduct does less than nothing. It takes action on complaints that the system is "set-up to easily bury or hide". Regulators I contacted since September 2001 and their responses are listed below and on the next two pages. While my Mother was alive, there was no place in NYC to report stealing under a forged POA. The greatest strength of each regulatory agency is to do nothing. A simple example is noted above. Two more examples are that the ProSe office at the Supreme Court told me that this belongs at the DA. The DA refused to open the case. The Department of Justice US Attorney's Office said this belongs at the FBI, and the FBI said they cannot find any federal laws that were broken. ( If I could find broken federal laws, they would re-examine the decision to do nothing!) Below the list of regulators doing nothing are suggestions for constructive change and the benefits. August 21, 2005, I recently received a letter from the Attorney General's office. I wrote to Albany. Link to the response here. December 6, 2004. Yesterday a letter from the Department of Justice arrived! Based on documentation they read, they suggested that the FBI be contacted. It was done! Link here to the DOJ letter . Happy Holidays to All! October 28, 2004 I was told that the DA will call me when they process information necessary to have intelligent conversation. Today is October 8, 2007, I am still waiting. The DA never called. The Mayor's Advisory on the Judiciary web site instructs people to file a copy of complaints to them and the chief administrative judge. Link to the site text here. I did that and received a letter from the Deputy Chief Administrative Judge. She referred my complaint to the judge I was complaining about and suggested that all further communication be directed to that judge. Link to the letter here TRUE STORY! On a more constructive note, I received a thank you from the US Attorney Office in DC. Naturally it was from the Federal Government, not the state! That tells us someone productive read this site! Link to the thank you here! October 23, 2004 - I receive a response from the New York State Commission of Investigation. They have no need to investigate and suggest I hire a lawyer. I responded kindly - I really did! Link to their letter and my response. August 4, 7 and 25th 2004 my petition to remove the executor, her response, references to the executor's misleading content and a cover letter went to the US Attorney Office in NYC and the STATE Judicial Review Committee. What they received is included in the petition. Link to US Attorney response here Link to The Judicial Review Committee response here. Link to the Judges Decision or Court order and Transcript of the 8-25-04 Session September 11, 2004 I receive a letter dated 9-9-04 from the Judicial Review Committee saying they never received my original complaint. Would I please send another one. The original was sent certified mail return receipt requested. It was signed for on August 10, 2004. The JRC is in the same building at the Grievance Committee, for whatever that's worth. I sent another copy today - September 13, 2004 Link here to read the letters . The Judicial Review Committee dismissed my complaint on April 1, 2005. Again Link here to the letter. 1. This was first reported to the DA in September 2001. I was told by the special prosecutions intake line to get the story in front of a Judge. If the Judge saw anything wrong it would be reported to the DA. The DA also claims to specialize in illegal use of law. The court did nothing. http://www.manhattanda.org/office_overview/investigation/legal/special_pros.htm Remember that the Court has no power for independent investigation. People need legal skills to get anything in front of a Judge and probably most important to remember is that the court believes and rules on everything submitted. 2. Via God’s grace this incident was officially reported to the Surrogate Court on October 15 2001, in a document called A Response to a Constructive Trust – Link here to the document a letter to the DA dated 9-2001 is included. A ruling on my petition was issued by the Court telling the executor to escrow money for me until the estate was settled. (A ruling is included in the petition to remove the executor.) There was an illegal mortgage taken under a forged POA on property left exclusively to me. That court order was ignored and never executed. 3. This was officially reported to the Grievance Committee in Dec 2001. A letter from the committee told me to bring actions of the executors lawyers to the attention of the court. If the court saw anything wrong, the disciplinary committee would take action. Again everybody did nothing - In Feb 2002 and shortly after, several mediation meetings were held. Everyone agreed to stop stealing at the meeting. When they left, everyone kept on stealing. The Court was made aware that all agreements were broken. Link here to a letter dated March 2002.That letter was also included in a petition for living expenses. Because the grievance committee told me bring the actions of the executor's lawyers to the court's attention, I referenced all fraud submitted in each court petition. Letters to the court are available if anyone wants them. Still the court reported nothing to the DA. I also prepared a document for the Court so an independent investigation would be easier. I didn’t know, they do nothing and the document would not be part of the records. Link here to the document.

Copyright 2009 MJ Jacobson